Name of Publisher Blog - Francisco Mamed

Phone - Area Code - 27 - Number of target - 30710059

Vitoria / ES - Brazil

Email: spiritualismcapixaba@yahoo.com.br

LOVE TO LIFE! ABORTION, NO!

PART I

The Brazilian Spiritist Federation, representing most of the spiritual movement national, promotes a sustained campaign in favor of life, whose slogan is: "IN DEFENSE OF LIFE".Because of this, fighting tirelessly against all attempts to legalize disgraceful acts as the death penalty, euthanasia and abortion, among others that threaten human life

The reason this fight is very simple: life is a divine gift that is lost in the dust of time and that in any way, is condensed in the narrow limits of carnal life, since it precedes and succeeds in simple life as we understand ( birth to death). Let us today with the abortion issue, this fetocídio qualified.

Abortion is the most barbaric crimes attributed to human intelligence. For a long time, especially with the flowering of feminism (which in the midst of achievements just brought the stain of excess, the nonsense) avenged ignorant and frivolous arguments, and the principal have always been: "It DONA WOMAN OF YOUR OWN BODY "" The FETUS CAN NOT EVEN BE CONSIDERED A HUMAN BEING. " Fragile, such arguments would not have to face the same time, they have to be the best instrument of truth.

Before facing the question of ownership that posits the woman about her own body (then the phenomenon that prevents death or diseases), we will focus on more essential question: What EMBRYO IS A HUMAN BEING OR IS A "THING"?

In legal terminology, comes to the unborn HUMAN BEING HAS DESIGNED, WHICH LOOKS AS IF BIRTH RIGHT FUTURE FACT. Therefore, to the legal world, the embryo is treated as a human being, both the Civil Code, on several occasions, included it in their legal stipulations:

= The unborn person has FORECAST OF RIGHTS (Article 4)

= The unborn child can be adopted (Article 372);

= The unborn child may be subject to curatorship (article 462);

= CAN TO DONATE to the unborn child (Article 1169);

And the scientific world, you say?

= FERTILIZATION WITH CHARGE ALREADY SE GENETIC DIFFERENTIATION IN RELATION TO PARENTS;

"The development of the unborn at any stage - zygote, morula, blastocyst, pre-embryo, embryo and fetus - is only a continuum of the same being that will not change after birth, but only comply with the later stages of development, passing from child to adolescent and adolescent to adult "(JA Silmara Chinelato - Professor of Civil Law and Copyright Law, USP).

= "The EGG CLOSES A COMPLETE HUMAN BEING, BUT THAT IS NOT fed to the public" (Dr. Nathanson)

A movie made by Dr. Nathanson shows the desperate struggle of the fetus to get rid of the curette, including showing that at that time, the heartbeat of the fetus goes from 140 to 200, while being chased to death.

Moreover, it is here an interesting note about Dr. Nathanson: Said was a citizen of the bastions of abortionists. There was no seminar, lecture or demonstration in which his name not be used (almost to idolatry) by frivolous as unquestioning supporters of abortion researcher, whose statistics were irrefutable. Well, that Doctor, whose abortions certainly afford him tons of meat fetus, perhaps by imposition of consciousness, and here quoted after the video (where noted terror Stamped on the action of the fetus to get rid of the "vacuum" that will shattered the fragile body), a show of force close the game opened up and reported, among other horrors committed by abortionists, the statistics about deaths of women who practice illegal abortions are forged (for more, much more) to force the view public to position themselves favorably to abortion.

Therefore, neither science nor the legal world have ratified the actions of abortionists. Only the extreme selfishness, pride, foolish, cowardly is a coldness that support abortion. We will continue this. Thank you for your attention!

LOVE TO LIFE! ABORTION, NO!

PART II

As stated in the previous article, one of the arguments still used by practitioners of abortion, is that the body belongs to the woman, and she may dispose of it freely.

Despite such an argument be ethically questionable, in fact, may (but may morally should not) the woman freely dispose of his body. Thus, it can hurt you at home, chop it with a razor blade and then get him drunk on alcohol can extract all the blood, even death, may martyr him as you wish, or you can man it tenderly and respectfully Finally, as you wish.

They have only one problem: the human who is receiving a fleshly body, and that it inhabits, never at any time, nor in the first instant of conception, is the appendix to the mother's body. In fact, it is an individual, whose genetic background is different from the father and mother at conception.

So what we have is a even be in several different stages. So when her mother or anyone else, kills his son, he is at what stage you are - zygote, morula, blastocyst, pre-embryo, embryo, fetus, newborn, infant, adolescent, young or adult, is always ALWAYS, killing the same being.The only difference that can be considered is the degree of resistance to the mother or the abortionist employed by it may face, which certainly put a man in the vigor of youth, will certainly be more difficult to be exterminated than one embryo, walled in the heat of the womb, whose big eyes can not be seen or examined the facial spasms.

Closing time for any questions that remain about the child being raised in the womb a fully independent and not an appendage of the mother, as sought by the feminist movements vain, the frivolous, it should be emphasized, as well remembered Dr. Smith Marília , a gynecologist who spoke at the Law School of USP, the famous "Largo Sao Francisco", from the moment of conception, the antibodies produced by the mother, working to expel the foreign body. As the egg needs protection for its implementation, there is a shock antigen in the bowels of the woman who creates a barrier height of the placenta, thus preventing the expulsion of being in training.

Furthermore, if the woman is offering one's own body, how is it that, by practicing abortion, which deprives it is another body, in this case his son's body?

Moving forward, take this opportunity to ponder some other quibbles who frequent the minds of those who favor the practice of such barbarity.

- Thousands of women dying from illegal abortions:

As we said in the previous article, the statistics relating to deaths in these conditions are manipulated to force the public to be favorable to abortion.

Moreover, if the abortionists are so concerned about women's health, why not do rallies, symposia, pressures in this state to more effectively meet the women who suffer in pregnancy status of such Eclampsia (or eclampsia) coming be a sort of convulsion that promotes changes in blood pressure in the final stages of pregnancy, and of such virulence that, according to statistics of 1997, killed 73% of pregnant women affected this badly, while abortion (illegal or not, because even in hospital the woman who promotes a life-threatening abortion, because of the uterine body to be gentle) accounted for 9.8% of maternal mortality. Why?? Somebody please answer me!

- FREE CHOICE

Confirmed that the unborn child is an independent being, their right to life is constraint, ie, all other rights of others, are conditioned to this. Soon, the woman may even have free choice, as it must have, indeed every human being should have free choice, but with respect for others. After all, freedom of choice for dating, sex, marriage, separation, lipstick, etc. .., does not mean freedom to choose to kill. Have you thought, what a mess: You are bothering me, BOOM! I will kill him.

So what you see is an endless list of arguments, all too fragile and only serve to anesthetize our consciences before the horrendous evil that we are practicing, not only those who promote abortion, but the omission: after all, fail to promote well, it is an evil. We will continue this subject, thank you for your attention.

Submitted by email